India's
Navratnas should do their bit for the country
17 Apr, 2013,
06.34AM IST
By Prashant Jain (Executive
Director & CIO, HDFC AMC)
It is commonly believed that fiscal deficits crowd out private
borrowing. A similar, if more prominent, trend is playing out in
equity. The government is divesting equity in PSUs to
fund its fiscal gap, thereby crowding out genuine seekers of equity (mainly infrastructure, power and manufacturing
businesses). Since equity money is lesser (and more fickle) than debt, the
crowding out effect is more pronounced in equities.
PSU divestments seem to be relatively insensitive to pricing/valuations. Stock prices of SAIL and Nalco fell ~30%, 20%, respectively over three months prior to divestment, and yet the government divested. Collateral damage played out. Tata Steel, Hindalco also plunged ~30% each around the same time. India desperately needs a capex cycle in key sectors, but government's eagerness to divest is crowding out equity and impairing equity capital raising ability by adversely impacting valuations.
Payout is the Way Out
The government's need for cash (to bridge the fisc) is as real as the need
for equity by private companies. Here's a
solution: one-time special dividends/buy-backs by select large PSUs.
This will raise cash for the government and leave
room for equity issuances by other businesses. PSUs like Coal
India, NMDC, NTPC, Oil India have hoarded Rs 65,000 crore,
Rs 22,000 crore, Rs 19,000 crore and Rs 14,000 crore, respectively
(September'12). In contrast, Reliance has done a buyback of Rs 4,000
crore. Hindustan Unilever and TCS pay out 50-80% of profits
as dividends. Why can't PSUs do the same?
Less Can be More
There are three
big benefits of distributing cash: Hoarding cash
depresses RoCE/RoE. Incremental returns on cash (5-6% post tax) lag the cost of
equity capital (~15%) or even Government of India borrowings (~8%). Second, the
higher RoCE/RoE profile achieved after cash is paid out leads to better
valuations. NTPC's valuations have fallen as its RoE is falling
(cash hoarding is a key reason). It can drive up RoE if it distributes
dividends. Third, potential misuse of cash under pressure to use cash is
prevented. Overseas asset
purchases use precious foreign exchange. Barely two in 10 overseas acquisitions
have met their cost of capital. There is little merit in Coal
India buying coal mines abroad. Instead, Coal India must develop local
resources quickly - domestic coal is not only cheaper but also creates
employment. It is better to buy coal/oil in the short-to-medium run
rather than acquire mines/fields at current high commodity prices and in low
interest rate environment, both leading to high valuations.
Need of the Hour: Revival of Investment Cycle
Imagine a scenario in which Coal India, NMDC, NTPC, Oil India etc declare a
special dividend of (say) Rs 50,000 crore. Even after this payout, they should
still have a cash balance of Rs 95,000 crore in March 2014.
Now consider the benefits: Equity supply will be reduced/eliminated. This will ease pressure on equity markets and create room for other companies to meaningfully raise equity. Divestment will be postponed to better times, to say the least. Valuations of these companies should improve with higher RoE, better utilisation of cash.
Now consider the benefits: Equity supply will be reduced/eliminated. This will ease pressure on equity markets and create room for other companies to meaningfully raise equity. Divestment will be postponed to better times, to say the least. Valuations of these companies should improve with higher RoE, better utilisation of cash.
Roughly Rs 6,000 crore (after dividend tax and government's share) will accrue to minority shareholders (insurance companies, FIIs, mutual funds and retail investors). This pool will probably come back to equity markets, thus further enabling creation of fresh capital. Bond yields will move lower as investors begin to believe in the fiscal deficit target.
Perils of Interest Income
Investors
see excess cash (and interest income) as an outcome of capital misallocation.
Return on cash typically lags core business return. Hence, such companies are penalised through
poor valuations. Investors want them to invest only in their core businesses. Else they must
return excess cash to shareholders.
"How many millionaires do you know who have become wealthy by investing in savings accounts? I rest my case," Robert G Allen.
High interest income often masks deterioration in underlying core profitability and returns of a business. Several uncompetitive PSUs (in the telecom sector, for example) hoarded cash and grew complacent even as their sectors transformed. They now make operating losses.
A special dividend of (say) Rs 50,000 crore by 4-5 large PSUs will do a lot of good to the country and no harm to these companies. They will be seen as efficient allocators of capital. The government will not be forced to divest at low valuations. There will be room for other companies in the core sectors to raise equity capital.
(The views expressed are of the author as on date and not of the company.)
No comments:
Post a Comment