Tuesday 6 November 2012

HUL's Nitin Paranjpe: How to Make Friends and Win



HUL's Nitin Paranjpe: How to Make Friends and Win

HUL’s Nitin Paranjpe is rewiring his organisation for the digital marketing era. And he’s leading from the front
Award: Best CEO MNC
Name: Nitin Paranjpe, CEO, HUL
Age: 49
Why He Won: For resurrecting HUL’s position as a premium multinational, after almost a decade in the wilderness. And for bringing the focus back on execution and profitable growth with a significant expansion of its distribution system.



When I met Nitin Paranjpe early in December last year, he very clinically dissected the difference between a successful entrepreneur and a manager. He told me, “The only difference is the relationship between ambition and resources.” 

It was something, he said, that was drilled into his head by legendary management thinker CK Prahalad, who was brought in by the board in 1999 to mentor a few people destined for larger roles at Hindustan Unilever (HUL). “Managers,” Paranjpe learnt from Prahalad, “have a mindset... where ambition (A) equals resources (R), a steady state condition. There are no entrepreneurs who start off believing A=R. They have virtually no resources, but dream big.”

To understand how the insight Prahalad offered played out during the course of Paranjpe’s career, it is important to put a few numbers into perspective. Since the time he took over as CEO four years ago, sales jumped 45 percent to Rs 22,800 crore; growth in profits averaged an eye-popping 25 percent; the company’s market capitalisation zoomed 60 percent to over Rs 1.14 lakh crore; and in January this year, the Nielsen Campus Track reported HUL had reclaimed its spot as the most preferred employer among B-School grads.

Compare this to what things were like when Paranjpe was offered the corner office four years ago. He was 44 then and the youngest chief executive HUL ever had. Growth in sales and profits were stagnant. Its stock had stayed around Rs 200 for eight years. The company had lost its position as the recruiter of choice at premier B-Schools. For an entity that once used to be known as the training ground for future CEOs in the country, this was as humiliating as it could get. 

After architecting a now well-documented and dramatic turnaround, it is easy therefore to imagine a smug 49-year-old man on the lecture circuit telling people how things ought to be done. What you have instead is a man back to school. Why? Because by his own admission, he couldn’t understand the brave new world his children inhabit. What the hell are they doing spending all their time on social networking sites like Facebook and Twitter? In any case, what are these places all about?

As he looked around, he realised his kids aren’t the only ones who live in this world. There are 121 million internet users in the country—the third largest user base in the world. Not surprisingly, their media consumption patterns are changing dramatically. It is only a matter of time, he figured, before their numbers overtake that of those who consume media on print and television. If that be true, he argued, HUL would have to work at moulding itself as the largest digital marketing firm in the country.

“Most people say we either need to do short-term or long-term. I say we have to run the business with a bifocal lens. Part of it is looking at this week, this month and this quarter and the other part is how do I shape this business and make it ‘future-proof’ five years from today. Both have to be done,” he argues.

While dealing with the short term part of the business is now easy for him, it is the long term he was beginning to get paranoid about. If HUL had to maintain the lead he had managed to create in his four years at the helm, both the company and he would have to change. “At a consumer goods company, if the consumer is moving in a certain direction, how can the head of the company say he doesn’t get it?” he asks rhetorically. 

So, he got himself a ‘reverse mentor’. A young 25-year-old at the firm was put in charge of tutoring the CEO on how to navigate the social media. How do you tag a person on Facebook? How do you write on somebody’s wall? How do you tweet? Most people at his level lead seminars. But he figured if he had to participate in the world his children were now a part of, he’d have to “go back to school” and attend digital workshops led by his brand managers, read the materials they insisted he read, and submit assignments they asked him to complete. When we last checked, he had 251 friends on Facebook; on Twitter though, he remains a passive participant.

Even as he embarked on this personal exercise, he initiated discussions with the management committee, an eight-member body that runs the day-to-day affairs of the company. At these meetings, he communicated how paranoid he was that HUL maintains its lead in the market place.

Marketing Director Hemant Bakshi says Paranjpe was clear the strategies that helped them win so far may not necessarily be what will help them win tomorrow. “Because the skills and capabilities with which I grew up as a marketer are dramatically different from the skills and capabilities needed in the future,” Paranjpe explained.

These arguments eventually won over the other members on the committee. Some chose the path of reverse mentoring like Paranjpe; others struck out on their own. On his part, Paranjpe reckoned it was time he dived headlong into uncharted waters. He moved on to plan his own online advertising campaigns, allocating budgets for them and seeing how the efficacy of such ads among audiences is measured. That, in a nutshell, is how HUL got into the digital marketing journey.

That done, he got into an agreement with Google to train the 100 senior most managers at HUL in the ways of the digital world by the end of this year. ‘Digitally certified’ is what they’re called. Eventually, he wants every employee in the company to be digitally certified. Says Leena Nair, executive director, human resources, “You may question why somebody in the supply chain needs to be digitally certified. But Nitin was clear that every employee in the firm has to be.”

For now though, the company is working hard at learning the new rules of this medium. The hardest one to absorb is that advertising cannot be intrusive and interruptive the way television advertising is. Instead it has to engage and integrate with whatever the customer is doing at any given moment. For instance, pop up ads on web pages are intrusive and drive people away. 


“So, all the work we are doing on digital—the certification process, the reverse mentoring—is to say this is a new medium and until we get educated in its ways, we won’t be able to create interesting options for our consumers,” says Bakshi.

Advertising agencies have been roped in as well to help navigate this landscape because nobody knows which way it is headed. 

All of the work the team at HUL is putting in is generating new lessons for their marketing teams. To cite just one instance, they quickly figured that the rules of engaging with consumers on the internet and mobile phones are very different from the worlds they grew up in. But there was a paradox.
While the younger employees understood this world, the purse strings were controlled by older people who were not always on the same wavelength. Simply put, the bosses lacked the judgement to decide if allocating resources to digital media would be wise.

That is also the reason why HUL’s marketing department is going deeper to understand what works in this world. On his part, Bakshi has set aside a corpus of Rs 10 crore as a ‘Digital Experimentation Fund’. 

The aim is to encourage employees to come up with interesting ideas. If it passes scrutiny, money from this corpus will be used to fund the idea and figure out if it works. “If you have to fail, fail early, before it becomes too expensive. If you have to fail and not make the same mistake again, then the failure is well worth it. But we don’t encourage failure. I encourage winning,” says Paranjpe. The first sets of pitches are expected to come in later this month. Every year, Paranjpe intends to double the resources allocated for projects like these. “It doesn’t matter how much it costs. This company can afford it,” he says.

The seeds to this corpus were planted when the senior team at HUL lent an ear to an unlikely quarter. Sometime last year a brand manager at Wheel, a detergent powder brand in the company’s portfolio, proposed what came to be known within the company as the ‘missed call’ campaign. The manager had observed that many Indians avoid placing a call on their cellphones because it cost them money. Instead, they place a call to the person they intend to speak to and hang up before the call is received. Inevitably, they would get called back. What if, the brand manager suggested, all sachets of Wheel had a message printed on them: “Missed call dijiye, muskurate rahiye [Give a missed call and stay smiling].” The message was accompanied by a number.

The idea was that if somebody indeed placed a ‘missed call’, the company would call back and regale the individual with an interesting anecdote that contained a message around the Wheel brand. From a marketer’s perspective, it sounded like an interesting proposition: Permission marketing. The idea was given the go-ahead and the outcome astonished the bosses. In three months, they received 15 million calls.

The numbers reinforced Paranjpe’s belief that digital will cause a tectonic shift in the years to come and he had to be prepared for it. The Rs 100 crore HUL now spends on digital marketing, may look like chump change in the future. (The company has Rs 2,634 crore at its disposal.) 

That said, Paranjpe also knows throwing money at the problem, just because HUL has enough of it, isn’t good enough. “So you either starve resources or create an ambition that is greater than the resources you have on hand. The bigger the gap, the better it is…because there the trick is, you suspend all room for rational dialogue.” 

Which is why, Paranjpe is insisting HUL becomes the biggest and most successful digital marketing company in a world where the rules are still unclear. As ambitions go, it is an incredibly tough one for a consumer marketing company. He knows that in spite of all the resources the firm has in terms of money, the only resource that will matter the most is ingenuity. Ingenuity of that kind cannot be drilled down from the top. Instead, it will have to be stoked from all quarters until everybody goes ballistic and all room for rational dialogue is closed.

The lessons we can learn from Baniyas - Akar Patel - Mint 27 Oct 12



The lessons we can learn from Baniyas

Aakar Patel, Mint – 27th October 2012

What makes the Baniya special? I am an admirer of this community that consistently produces India’s only world-class industrialists.
What are their secrets?

We are fortunate that the Birla family have been written about and have themselves written enough material for us to get a glimpse into the working of a successful, conservative Marwari Baniya family. The word Marwari being used as a generic name for Baniyas from Rajasthan. The Birlas are, of course, from Shekhawati.

There is a biography of patriarch Ghanshyam Das Birla and an autobiography of his son Krishna Kumar (KK) Birla, both in English. Then there is Swantah Sukhay (For My Own Pleasure), the autobiography in Hindi of Basant Kumar (BK) Birla, father of Aditya and grandfather of Kumar Mangalam. Published in 1991, it is a remarkable document and much can be learnt from it if it’s read carefully.

Often its descriptions are generic and uninteresting. For example BK’s account of his long-standing partnership with the Dutch, in textile firm Century-Enka, is childish in its simplicity. Dr X was a nice man, Mr Y was a good man and so on.

It is when BK tells us about himself and his family that he is interesting. The first thing he says to describe his style is: “Arthik niyantran mera achha hai (My control over finance is sound) (chapter 10, page 67).

His main instruction is that “hisaab kitaab” be kept up to date with clean entries and every detail. This tight control over numbers is the reason that “meri companiyon mein lambi-chaudi gadbad nahin hui (this is why there’s been no major trouble in my companies).” He says he learnt accounts as a boy under a man called Shantimal Mehta, a Baniya. Birla had a natural talent for picking it up.

Father Ghanshyam Das (GD) Birla made a one-year programme for him to learn it, and BK says he needed the full year under Mehta’s training. He learnt: cash, copying, accounting, raising bills, understanding bank statements, daily reports, daily and annual profit and loss accounts, savings and expenses, and sales.

Employees said later that where they sought to hide or pad up numbers, inevitably Babu’s (BK’s) eye would prise open those grey columns.
Through his working life, before the 12th of each month, he examined the books of the previous month. This is staggering devotion to numbers. Anticipating the reader’s astonishment, he says it is absolutely essential and he never delayed this practice: “Vilambh karne se nuksan hota hai (Delay results in loss).” He focused on the hisaab kitaab of some of his firms every month, some every second month.

Lesson I:
The Marwari Baniya’s company is controlled through the balance sheet. Management through accountancy, not through business administration. Basant Kumar says he knew which of his companies were well managed purely through this exercise. After this, he met the managers to listen to what was going on. The debrief of larger firms took one or two full days each month. These meetings served three purposes: They gave the managers confidence, gave him a window to their views, and the opportunity to assess their capacity, and their character. After learning accounts, Basant Kumar learnt how to manage a mill under Murlidhar Dalmia and Sitaram Khemka (again, both Baniyas).

He learnt how to operate the machines. However, at 70, he admits his weakness is in technical matters. He lists the following reasons: Not enough primary knowledge of engineering, diversified businesses, technicians worked on the site where he couldn’t meet them often. It wasn’t that he was uninterested, but his “contribution was mainly economic and financial”.
At the age of 13, the family announced it would stop giving BK money. He had to manage his expenses, and contribute to the house’s, by making money on the stock market, which he had to figure out himself with the family broker’s help. He made Rs.4,000 the first year, 1935, and paid income tax at 14.
Born in 1921, BK began working in 1936 on turning 15. He recorded in his diary (in English): “I began my business career. Went to the office at three O’ clock, learning account in jute mill and cotton mill. Worked up to 5:45. Felt ‘battle bliss’. I ask God to spread His blessings upon me as a businessman.”

In mid-1939, at 18, he was given India’s largest mill, Kesoram, which was making losses. A couple of months later, Neville Chamberlain declared war on Hitler. The British government began buying hosiery aggressively for its troops, and the profits of Indian mills jumped.

By 19, BK was independent. GD need be consulted only when issuing fresh capital. Else the patriarch stopped meeting managers and stayed away, making only the occasional inquiry: “Basanta, Kesoram theek chal rahi hai na? Kay faydo hai (Everything going well? What’s the profit)?”
GD’s advice, when he gave it, was generic: “Be cautious, keep your finances strong, ijjat par koi batta nahin aave (our honour should be unstained).”
It is incredible that a 19-year-old should have managed India’s largest mill successfully .

Lesson II:
Business is learnt by doing business.

Along with the mill, BK was handed a new assignment. GD introduced him to a pharmaceuticals expert, Hungarian Dr Perks, and after a 10-minute discussion dismissed them. BK and Perks had to begin a medicine firm. Which medicine? They were not told and had to find out themselves. Dr Perks scanned the market and decided it had to be a hormonal drug. This required cow organs, which he secured from an abattoir.

GD had no problem with this but when the older men in the family, BK’s grandfather and uncles, found out “bawander mach gaya (all hell broke loose)”. Animal organs? A cow’s!? They were furious at BK and showed it. After this the project was suspended for a couple of months while BK tried to explain to an irritated Dr Perks why they had to find another route.
Soon after the World War began and Dr Perks fled back to Hungary. The project ended. The Birlas audited their loss. It came to Rs.2.5 lakh, and auditor Kishandutt Goenka said the hisaab-kitaab was not in order (avyavasthit). BK was summoned and given a shouting. The loss was fine, but it was unacceptable that he had been lax with the accounts.

Lesson III:
Having no control over the business is worse than losing the business.

The Birlas were fiscal conservatives and G.D. Birla was terrified of debt. He usually set 25% of a firm’s start-up value aside as a support fund, an unthinkable waste of capital today. His response to Basant Kumar’s proposal that they raise money by issuing convertible debentures was: Main aisi jokhim lene ke viruddh hoon (I am against such risks).”

“This was a sound policy for its time,” writes Basant Kumar, “it gave us slow and solid growth.” After 1975, it became easier to raise money and issue capital. Government-owned funds were hungry for good shares. Banks also were keen to loan money. A new generation of businessmen, at their head Dhirubhai Ambani, began building large enterprises.

In 1981, Aditya Birla, then 37, told his father BK he wanted to expand Indian Rayon by issuing convertible debentures. BK agreed. When GD found out, he was aghast and confronted his son. BK did not back down and Aditya had his way.

Lesson IV:
Conservatism does not stand still. Know your environment and where you stand in it.
BK writes in detail how pragmatically the Birlas split their empire after GD died. There is much material here and I will return to it in a future piece.
My friend Shashank Jain, also a Baniya, says the accounts-based approach of management is from another era.
Today, more skill is needed, including modern ideas. How remarkable then that the Baniya has adapted to this also better than others. One of India’s smallest castes, he occupies numbers 1. Mukesh Ambani 2. Lakshmi Mittal 4. Savitri Jindal 5. Sunil Mittal 6. Kumar Mangalam Birla 7. Anil Ambani 8. Dilip Shanghvi and 9. Shashi and Ravi Ruia in the list of India’s 10 richest people.
We can all learn from Baniyas, and take from them what it is our culture and our caste misses.
Aakar Patel is a writer and a columnist.
Send your feedback to replytoall@livemint.com

Tackling the Myth of Indian Inefficiency (Sort Of)




Tackling the Myth of Indian Inefficiency (Sort Of)
By Michael SchumanOct. 29, 2012

 
couple of weeks ago, I tried to convince the world that China isn’t as efficient as many believe. Now I’m about to take on an even more daunting challenge — making the case that India isn’t quite as inefficient as most people insist.
Many of you reading right now are probably having a good laugh. How can India, with its cow-lined roadways and infamously entrenched bureaucracy, even come close to the slick, high-speed railways and directed policymaking of China? Those same people who praise the modern transport and quick decisionmaking of China often go on to criticize India for its miserable infrastructure and plodding reform efforts. India’s fractious democratic political system, the critique goes, compares poorly with China’s more clinical authoritarian regime when it comes to implementing tough economic policies and building necessary roads and airports.
Is the comparison fair? To a great degree, yes. Reform in India has often ebbed and flowed on the unpredictable tides of electoral politics. While villagers in China can get cleared away to build a new road, villagers in India have rights to protect their interests and their land, slowing down the pace of development. India’s overly bureaucratic bureaucracy ties up power projects and other important investments in regulatory knots. Consulting firm McKinsey figures that completing a power plant in India takes about twice as long as in China. In the World Bank’s rankings of countries by ease of doing business, China, at 91, sits well ahead of India, at 132. These hurdles are having a detrimental impact on India’s growth and are big reasons why India’s development has trailed China’s.
But the situation in India is improving. I was recently in the New Delhi airport for the first time in three years, and I discovered that the old international terminal, in which I have spent far too many bleary-eyed hours in the middle of the night waiting in interminable lines, has been replaced with a spiffy new one that is every bit as efficient as anything in China. (Just try to ignore the vomit-colored carpeting.) The top policymakers at the national level clearly realize the need to slice through the red tape blocking other projects. New Finance Minister P. Chidambaram is striving to form a multiministerial “national investment board” to fast-track important power projects and other investments held up by the bureaucracy.
Chidambaram has been on a bit of a roll lately. Just when it seemed the current administration of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh was too tied up in politics to mount any meaningful reform effort, Chidambaram engineered a flurry of measures over the past two months, which further opened the retail, insurance and airline sectors to foreign investors. The recent reform drive proves a point about Indian democracy as well. Though at times it may seem messy, India’s democratic system has produced a tremendous amount of economic reform over the past 20 years. All it takes is the political will to press forward with the changes, and some effort to build enough consensus to support those changes. China, despite the fact that it is an authoritarian regime, often gets stuck in political paralysis of its own on important reform. There is widespread agreement both inside and outside of China on the sort of reforms the country requires to make growth more sustainable — promoting consumption, improving the financial sector, reining in state enterprises — but the reforms have come only slowly because of opposition from political factions and special interests. India’s reform debates happen on TV and in the newspapers; China’s take place behind closed doors.
That isn’t to say India doesn’t have a ton left to do. As I detail in my contribution to TIME’s recent special issue on India, Chidambaram’s latest reforms need to be just an opening salvo in a much more sustained effort at dismantling the barriers to economic growth and investment. That means reforming the government to make it more responsive to the needs of businesspeople and effective in implementing new policies; further improving infrastructure to bring down the costs of doing business; and much deeper deregulation. Such steps would allow the real strength of India to drive growth higher — the nation’s stellar private businesses. If there is one area in which India is no doubt more efficient than China, it is the corporate sector. Historically, Indian companies are better managed and more profitable than China’s.
If India does become more and more efficient, the potential is enormous. Citigroup economists predicted in a report last year that India, not China, could be the world’s biggest economy by 2050. So instead of complaining about India, maybe businesspeople should bet on its (more efficient) future.